Posts
I was bored so I actually did it.
Rollins
| SEASON | TEAM | G | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| 2001 | Phi | 158 | 656 | 97 | 180 | 29 | 12 | 14 | 54 | 48 | 108 | 46 | 8 | .274 | .323 | .419 | .742 |
| 2002 | Phi | 154 | 637 | 82 | 156 | 33 | 10 | 11 | 60 | 54 | 103 | 31 | 13 | .245 | .306 | .380 | .686 |
| 2003 | Phi | 156 | 628 | 85 | 165 | 42 | 6 | 8 | 62 | 54 | 113 | 20 | 12 | .263 | .320 | .387 | .707 |
| 2004 | Phi | 154 | 657 | 119 | 190 | 43 | 12 | 14 | 73 | 57 | 73 | 30 | 9 | .289 | .348 | .455 | .803 |
| 2005 | Phi | 158 | 677 | 115 | 196 | 38 | 11 | 12 | 54 | 47 | 71 | 41 | 6 | .290 | .338 | .431 | .769 |
| 2006 | Phi | 158 | 689 | 127 | 191 | 45 | 9 | 25 | 83 | 57 | 80 | 36 | 4 | .277 | .334 | .478 | .812 |
The formatting didn't want to work so I manually added these:
Presented As Avg/OB/OBP/OPS
2001 .274 .323 .419 .742
2002 .245 .306 .380 .686
2003 .263 .320 .387 .707
2004 .289 .348 .455 .803
2005 .290 .338 .431 .769
Reyes
| SEASON | TEAM | G | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| 2003 | NYM | 69 | 274 | 47 | 84 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 32 | 13 | 36 | 13 | 3 | .307 | .334 | .434 | .768 |
| 2004 | NYM | 53 | 220 | 33 | 56 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 31 | 19 | 2 | .255 | .271 | .373 | .644 |
| 2005 | NYM | 161 | 696 | 99 | 190 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 58 | 27 | 78 | 60 | 15 | .273 | .300 | .386 | .686 |
| 2006 | NYM | 153 | 647 | 122 | 194 | 30 | 17 | 19 | 81 | 53 | 81 | 64 | 17 | .300 | .354 | .487 | .841 |
| 2007 | NYM | 160 | 681 | 119 | 191 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 57 | 77 | 78 | 78 | 21 | .280 | .354 | .421 | .775 |
Presented As Avg/OB/OBP/OPS
2003 .307 .334 .434 .768
2004 .255 .271 .373 .644
2005 .273 .300 .386 .686
2006 .300 .354 .487 .841
2007 .280 .354 .421 .775
What exactly am I supposed to be looking at here? I don't see anything that really sticks out at me. There are differences sure but I would say that they are made up for in other areas represented.
Oh well. Just a quick point.
2 comments:
Reyes has 3 full years in the Bigs. So compare each of their first 3 FULL years. I did not check the stats so i am assuming these numbers are correct, but your OBP category should be SLG.
First 3 Full years in the Bigs:
Reyes: 2005, 2006 & 2007
Rollins 2001, 2003 & 2004
So lets average each 3 year category out (feel free to check my math):
Games & AB's are comparable
RUNS
Reyes: 113
Rollins 88
Winner: REYES
HITS
Reyes: 192
Rollins: 167
Winner: REYES
DOUBLES
Reyes:30
Rollins:35
Winner ROLLINS
TRIPLES
Reyes:15
Rollins:9
Winner: REYES
HOME RUNS
Reyes:13
Rollins;11
Winner: REYES
RBI's
Reyes: 65
Rollins:59
Winner: REYES
WALKS
Reyes: 52
Rollins:52
Winner: TIE
STRIKE OUTS
Reyes: 79
Rollins:108
Winner: REYES
AVG
Reyes: .284
Rollins:.261
Winner; REYES
OBP
Reyes: .336
Rollins:.316
Winner: REYES
SLG
Reyes: .431
Rollins:.395
Winner; REYES
OPS
Reyes: .767
Rollins:.712
Winner: REYES
So aside from Runs and a Tie in Walks, REYES trumps Rollins in EVERY CATEGORY!
Conclusion: Reyes has shown to be better than Rollins when comparing their first 3 years of Ball. Rollins was the MVP 4 years later. So if Reyes continues on this path of growth, Reyes should be an MVP within the next four years. And Finally, according to your ridiculous hypothesis that Reyes is overrated and that Victorino is comparable to Reyes, then Rollins is in fact worser than Victorino.
I Rest MY case.
Check that:
Aside from Doubles and a Tie in Walks, REYES trumps Rollins in EVERY CATEGORY!
Post a Comment